 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
A
'bad cocktail' of politics, charity
By Tom Ferrick Jr.
Columnist
Philadelphia
29 October 2006
If
you visit the Web site of the Operation Good Neighbor Foundation, you'll come
away with the impression that it is a little charity that is based in Bryn Mawr
and does good deeds.
These
days, there's hardly any mention of its founder. Except for one brief
reference, he's become a nonperson, a la the old Soviet days.
Don't
be deceived. The founder of Operation Good Neighbor is Sen. Rick Santorum, and
he is intertwined with this charity to this day.
Since
2001, the foundation has served as a platform for Santorum to espouse
"compassionate conservatism." It has served, de facto, as a privately
financed source of WAMs - an acronym for "walking around money," the
grants pols so love to spread among groups to build goodwill and burnish their
image.
In
the spring, when I first looked into Operation Good Neighbor, Santorum's
presence was hard to ignore. The Web site featured 34 pictures of the senator,
most in the same pose: standing amid smiling recipients, handing over oversized
checks, usually in the amount of $10,000.
The
charity claims to have given out more than $700,000 since its inception. It
rarely gives to the same group twice. It does not offer sustained support. It
prefers one-shot (or, rather, one-photograph) deals.
I
have a problem with foundations founded by pols, and I am not the only one. As
IRS Commissioner Michael Everson told the National Journal recently:
"Politics, money and charities make for a bad cocktail."
WAM-a-rama
Everson
was commenting on the recent trend of pols creating or being closely connected
to foundations. The list includes Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, former
House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, and Democratic Rep. Alan Mollohan of
One
problem is transparency.
If
I contribute $2,100 to the Santorum campaign (the individual limit under law),
it will be duly recorded and open for the public to see.
If
I give $27,900 to Operation Good Neighbor, though, my name and amount of
donation remain secret. As an added benefit, I get to deduct the donation from
my taxes.
Now,
I ask you: How does Rick Santorum see my gift? As a donor, I hope he sees it as
a lump sum - $30,000 donated by his pal, Tom.
In
the spring, after bad mojo settled around these foundations, Sen. Max Baucus
(D., Mont.) offered an amendment to require foundations started by elected
officials to disclose the names and gifts of all donors who gave more than
$250.
For the millisecond that amendment was alive, Santorum supported
it, according to Rick Cohen, the recently retired director of the
The
amendment failed in committee, though Baucus has since introduced it as a
separate bill.
Open your books
Accordingly,
this summer my colleague Carrie Budoff wrote to Operation Good Neighbor, asking
it to disclose its donors and their gifts.
Last
week, she heard back. The foundation declined to disclose, saying it wanted to
respect the privacy of donors.
When I told Cohen, his reaction was: "He cosponsors that
[Baucus] amendment and then he refuses to reveal his donors? He has no
shame."
Someone
say "Amen."
In
the midst of a difficult reelection campaign, Santorum has sought to erase his
ties to the foundation.
When
radio host Don Imus asked him about it earlier this year, the senator replied:
"I try to keep my relationship as just someone who sort of shows up at
events to help folks raise money and take pictures with organizations that
receive the grants. I don't have any involvement in who gets these grants...
[or] involvement in raising the money directly. I don't ask anybody for money,
and to be honest with you, for the most part, I don't really know that many
people who give to the charity."
Translated:
I have nothing to do with it, except to show up to take the credit.
I
only have a transcript of the interview, so I don't know if Imus laughed at
Santorum's statement.
I sure did.
© 2006 Philadelphia Inquirer. All
rights reserved.
