Back Donate

How can grantmakers join their power with community power to create lasting, equitable outcomes?

Many grantmakers want to see better outcomes in our communities and solve long-standing inequities on education, health, economic mobility and other social issues.

But equitable change rests on the use of power to change systems, policies and attitudes. And whose power? How can grantmakers effectively use power for positive, lasting change?

A new SSIR series

NCRP has teamed up with the Stanford Social Innovation Review in Power in Philanthropy, a new series based on “Power Moves: Your essential philanthropy assessment guide for equity and justice.”

During the next few weeks, the series will feature diverse perspectives from funders, nonprofits and others on the three dimensions of power: building power, sharing power, and wielding power.

It will reframe popular concepts in philanthropy such as risk, capacity building and public leadership through the lens of power and equitable outcomes.

Dive in!

Please read and share with your colleagues and networks the first post in the series. Don’t forget to also share comments, questions and insights, and encourage your contacts to do the same:

Kathleen Enright, Grantmakers for Effective OrganizationsPower, privilege and effectiveness: Are funders connecting the dots?
by Kathleen P. Enright, President and CEO, Grantmakers for Effective Organizations

To advance equity more effectively in collaboration with nonprofits and communities, grantmakers must share power with and leverage privilege for nonprofits and communities.

New posts coming soon

Don’t miss posts by Alison Corwin of Surda Foundation, Luz Vegas-Marquis of Marguerite Casey Foundation, Barbara Hostetter and Jim Canales of Barr Foundation, Ruth Cummings and Sharon Alpert of Nathan Cummings Foundation and others.

Visit Power in Philanthropy on SSIR 

Or stay tuned on NCRP’s blog for links
to the latest articles in the series.

Join the conversation on #PowerMovesEquity.

For Immediate Release

New director joins NCRP’s board

Don Ragona elected to serve on philanthropy watchdog board

Washington, D.C. (9/27/2018) – The National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy (NCRP) board of directors yesterday elected Donald M. Ragona as a new member during its board meeting.

“We are honored to have Don on the board,” said the Rev. Starsky Wilson, president and CEO of Deaconess Foundation, and chair of NCRP’s board. “His experience and leadership in promoting racial, economic and social equity will enrich NCRP’s continuing efforts to inspire donors and funders to ensure that our social justice movements have the resources to succeed.”

Cynthia Renfro, principal of Civis Consulting, concludes her service as a director this month, having served the maximum allowable nine years.

“We at NCRP are deeply grateful to Cynthia for sharing her passion, vision and wisdom for the past nine years. Her leadership helped strengthen NCRP as an advocate for philanthropy at its best,” said Aaron Dorfman, chief executive of NCRP. “I am excited to work with Don, whom I deeply admire. His fresh perspective will be invaluable as NCRP continues to advocate for the kind of philanthropy that prioritizes and empowers marginalized communities during these challenging times.”

Donald M. Ragona

In addition to serving as Director of Development and House Counsel at Native American Rights Fund, Ragona has also guest lectured on federal Indian law and Indian issues at various universities such as Brown University, University of Colorado and University of Arizona. He frequently speaks on estate planning, philanthropic and current issues in Indian country and their potential effects on Native nations at Native conferences such as those sponsored by the National Congress of American Indians, National Indian Gaming Association and Native Americans in Philanthropy. He is a member of the Matinecock tribe.

Continuing leadership

The board also re-elected Bill Dempsey, senior advisor at MoveOn.org; Cristina Jiménez, co-founder and executive director of United We Dream Network, and NCRP board secretary; Vivek Malhotra, strategy and organizational development consultant, and NCRP board treasurer; Molly Schultz Hafid, associate director at TCC Group; and Rev. Wilson.

Jocelyn Sargent, executive director of The Hyams Foundation, replaces Renfro on the executive committee of the board.

Biographies of NCRP board members are available on www.ncrp.org.

About NCRP

The National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy amplifies the voice of nonprofits and the communities they serve in the philanthropic sector. Through research and advocacy, it works to ensure that grantmakers and donors contribute to the creation of a fair, just and equitable world.

###

Contact: Yna C. Moore at (202) 557-1381 or ymoore[at]ncrp.org.

Complete List of NCRP’s Board of Directors:

Executive Committee

  • Rev. Starsky Wilson (Chair), Deaconess Foundation
  • Daniel Lee (Vice Chair), Levi Strauss Foundation
  • Vivek Malhotra (Treasurer),  Strategy and Organizational Development Consultant
  • Cristina Jiménez (Secretary), United We Dream Network
  • Jocelyn Sargent (At-Large), The Hyams Foundation

Directors

  • Sharon Alpert, Nathan Cummings Foundation
  • Bill Dempsey, MoveOn.org
  • Taj James, Movement Strategy Center
  • Mary Lassen, Center for Community Change
  • Ruth W. Messinger, American Jewish World Service
  • Donald M. Ragona, Native American Rights Fund
  • Joseph Scantlebury, W.K. Kellogg Foundation
  • Molly Schultz Hafid, TCC Group
  • Pamela Shifman, NoVo Foundation
  • Lateefah Simon, Akonadi Foundation
  • Katherine S. Villers, Community Catalyst

Donald M. Ragona of Native American Rights Fund was elected to NCRP’s board of directors yesterday, and Cynthia Renfro of Civis Consulting moved on after 9 years of service.

We’re excited to announce that yesterday, NCRP’s board elected Don Ragona as a new director.

“We are honored to have Don on the board,” said the Rev. Starsky Wilson, president and CEO of Deaconess Foundation, and chair of NCRP’s board. “His experience and leadership in promoting racial, economic and social equity will enrich NCRP’s continuing efforts to inspire donors and funders to ensure that our social justice movements have the resources to succeed.”

Cynthia Renfro, principal of Civis Consulting, concludes her service as a director this month, having served the maximum allowable nine years.

“We at NCRP are deeply grateful to Cynthia for sharing her passion, vision and wisdom for the past nine years. Her leadership helped strengthen NCRP as an advocate for philanthropy at its best,” said Aaron Dorfman, chief executive of NCRP. “I am excited to work with Don, whom I deeply admire. His fresh perspective will be invaluable as NCRP continues to advocate for the kind of philanthropy that prioritizes and empowers marginalized communities during these challenging times.”

Donald M. Ragona

In addition to serving as Director of Development and House Counsel at Native American Rights Fund, Don has also guest lectured on federal Indian law and Indian issues at various universities such as Brown University, University of Colorado and University of Arizona. He frequently speaks on estate planning, philanthropic and current issues in Indian country and their potential effects on Native nations at Native conferences such as those sponsored by the National Congress of American Indians, National Indian Gaming Association and Native Americans in Philanthropy. He is a member of the Matinecock tribe.

Continuing leadership

The board also re-elected Bill Dempsey, senior advisor at MoveOn.org; Cristina Jiménez, co-founder and executive director of United We Dream Network, and NCPR board secretary; Vivek Malhotra, strategy and organizational development consultant, and NCRP board treasurer; Molly Schultz Hafid, associate director at TCC Group; and Rev. Wilson.

Jocelyn Sargent, executive director of The Hyams Foundation, replaces Renfro on the executive committee of the board.

Meet our board members!
View the complete list of NCRP’s board of directors.

For funders to share power with their grant partners, they need to acknowledge the sources of their wealth and privilege, use hard data to discern inequitable practices and go beyond rigid funding and communication approaches to build consistent, trusting relationships.

What would you see if you held a mirror up to your foundation? That “Philanthropy ain’t fair” was one response, as NCRP facilitated a frank conversation about funder practices that can get in the way of productive, equitable relationships with communities.

In this 3rd webinar of NCRP’s Power Moves series, grantmakers and nonprofit leaders discussed what it means to share power with grant partners and communities. NCRP’s Power Moves assessment guide helps funders examine how well they build, share and wield power to advance equity and justice.

The presentation, “Ceding Control: Sharing philanthropy’s power for equitable, inclusive relationships,” was cosponsored by Funders for LGBTQ Issues, moderated by Alfonso Wenker, co-founder and principal of Team Dynamics LLC, and featured 4 seasoned practitioners in the art and science of listening to and co-leading with communities.

What does it mean to share power in philanthropy?

Sharing power is about trusting communities and making decisions collectively with them, says Lindsie Bear, program director of the Native Cultures Fund at the Humboldt Area Foundation.

To do this well, grantmakers need to build trust, which requires honesty about the sources of foundation assets and power.

When working with Native communities, this means openly acknowledging the colonization of indigenous peoples and exploitation of their resources that enabled whites to accumulate wealth over centuries.

When grantmakers exhibit distrust – for example, with onerous grant application and reporting requirements – it compounds the effects of historic oppression.

Michelle McMurray, senior program officer for health and human services at The Pittsburgh Foundation, views sharing power as trying to be in a different kind of relationship with stakeholders.

She does this by meeting them in their own spaces, whether at community events or on social media, and by seeking non-monetary ways to support their work beyond grants, such as making connections to other funders.

Key to this approach is getting feedback, including through informal interactions. It also means having the courage to turn the mirror inward to self-critique with hard data and with love, so foundation staff can move from believing in racial justice to actually operationalizing those values.

Bill Gallegos brought a grassroots perspective as co-chair of the Funder Engagement Working Group of the Building Equity and Alignment for Impact (BEA) Initiative, and as former executive director of Communities for a Better Environment (CBE).

He advised that building trust in order to share power requires moving beyond one-off conversations to ongoing, consistent interactions among funders and communities, with resources for child care, food, transportation and other supports that enable participation.

While program officers are often comfortable being the go-between with grant partners and other community leaders, they have to deal with power hierarchies in their own institutions.

Jane Leu, founder and CEO of Smarter Good and co-author of Unicorns Unite: How nonprofits and foundations can build epic partnerships, noted that many boards don’t interact with nonprofits enough to understand their challenges, and nonprofits are afraid to be honest with funders.

Sharing power requires changing the mindset that the money is the foundation’s, rather than being held and used for public benefit.

What are concrete examples of sharing power?

  • Jane Leu recommends advisory boards comprised of grant partners as a proactive step to help funder boards get more comfortable with sharing power.
  • Lindsie Bear acts on feedback, input and requests from the community, which helps build trust. She also recommends thinking outside the box of foundation perpetuity to envision giving the resources back to the community.
  • Michelle McMurray gave community leaders funding to meet on their own, without the foundation present, and then worked through conflict productively to design a social justice fund, which is advised by Black and Latinx women activists.
  • Bill Gallegos urges funders to show greater trust in grassroots organizations to manage grant funds and to move beyond a narrow set of criteria and metrics that exclude movements led by communities of color from receiving grants.

How can funders learn more?

Lisa Ranghelli is senior director of assessment and special projects at NCRP and primary author of Power Moves. Follow @NCRP and @lisa_rang on Twitter, and join the conversation using #PowerMovesEquity!

For Immediate Release

Foundations and donors: Stop funding the gentrification of movements

NCRP journal also offers reflections on CEO oversight in the wake of the SVCF scandal, immigration reform and more

Washington, D.C.  (9/25/2018) – Many foundations and donors are still trying to wrestle with ways to respond to the challenges the country is facing and to move equity and justice forward. Actions are necessary. But if funders are not careful, they may end up hurting the issues and communities they care about.

“Our strength as Americans comes from our ability to work together,” wrote Aaron Dorfman, chief executive of the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy (NCRP). “With so many nonprofits and foundations knitting together a landscape of people from different places and of different races into a whole, I am hopeful for our future.”

The newly released September edition of “Responsive Philanthropy” invites grantmakers and philanthropists to pause, reflect and be inspired to take action that is grounded in the wellbeing of marginalized communities and a future where all people thrive.

The gentrification of movements: 4 Ways funders can stop putting raisins in the potato salad

Vanessa Daniel, executive director of Groundswell Fund, observes how well-funded, white-led nonprofit organizations have adopted strategies that have been used for decades by people of color-led groups.

She calls this the gentrification of movements, and issues a wakeup call to funders: “Aside from being ineffective in moving the needle on social change generally, this funding approach only reinforces white supremacy,” writes Daniel.

In pursuit of equity: A family foundation’s story

Cynthia Addams, chief executive and Colin Jones, grants manager of The Collins Foundation, writes about the family foundation’s journey in diversity, equity and inclusion.

For the Portland, Oregon-based foundation, opening the board to non-family members has been an integral part of their efforts.

Reflections in the wake of the Silicon Valley Community Foundation

The scandal that rocked the Silicon Valley Community Foundation is a stark reminder that boards need to have effective oversight of CEOs.

BoardSource’s chief executive Anne Wallestad and NCRP’s Dorfman identify four important questions that boards need to ask themselves to protect their organizations.

Change culture and attitude to get it right on immigration reform

Rev. Ryan Eller, executive director of Define American, notes the need for funders to support efforts to shift people’s perceptions of immigrants to move immigration reform in the right direction.

“While our movement is investing in ballot measures and bills, the anti-immigrant movement is investing in a cultural narrative that has successfully convinced the public that immigrants are our enemy and ought to be feared,” Eller writes.

The journal also features NCRP member LA Voice, a multi-racial, multi-faith community organization that believes all people have a voice and the power to transform their communities and the country.

Responsive Philanthropy articles are available at no cost on NCRP’s website.

About NCRP

For more than 40 years, the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy has been amplifying the voice of nonprofits and the communities they serve in the philanthropic sector. Through research and advocacy, it works to ensure that grantmakers and donors contribute to the creation of a fair, just and equitable world. For more information, visit www.ncrp.org.

###

Contact:

Yna C. Moore, ymoore[at]ncrp.org or (202) 557-1381

The mid-term elections are just a few weeks away. Our strength as Americans comes from our ability to work together. With so many nonprofits and foundations knitting together a landscape of people from different places and of different races into a whole, I am hopeful for our future.

We cannot let the greedy few and the politicians they finance divide us against each other based on what someone looks like, where they come from or how much money they have. It’s time to stand up for each other and come together. It is time for us to vote for leaders who see all of us as equal, whether we are white, Black or brown, who respect all of our families, and who will govern for all of us.

Our latest edition of Responsive Philanthropy invites us to reflect deeply on our work and then take action that is grounded in the communities that matter to us and the future that’s at stake.

The gentrification of movements: 4 Ways funders can stop putting raisins in the potato salad

Vanessa Daniel of Groundswell Fund observes how grassroots strategies that have been used for decades by people of color-led organizations have gained the attention of funders. Yet it is well-funded, white-led organizations appropriating the strategies as their own that are reaping the benefits. “Aside from being ineffective in moving the needle on social change generally, this funding approach only reinforces white supremacy,” writes Daniel.

In pursuit of equity: A family foundation’s story

For many family foundations, taking the big step towards diversity, equity and inclusion is daunting. Cynthia Addams and Colin Jones of The Collins Foundation share the foundation’s growth and evolution. Opening the board to non-family members has been an integral part of their efforts.

Reflections in the wake of the Silicon Valley Community Foundation

BoardSource’s Anne Wallestad and NCRP’s Aaron Dorfman identify four important questions on CEO oversight that boards need to ask themselves to protect their organizations.  They write, “The board’s role in CEO oversight is not a straightforward or easy role to play, but it is an absolutely critical one.”

Change culture and attitude to get it right on immigration reform

Define American’s Rev. Ryan Eller urges funders to get behind efforts to shift people’s perceptions of immigrants. Eller observes that the focus on policy change hasn’t been effective and may lead to more harm: “While our movement is investing in ballot measures and bills, the anti-immigrant movement is investing in a cultural narrative that has successfully convinced the public that immigrants are our enemy and ought to be feared.”

Finally, our Member Spotlight features NCRP member LA Voice, a multi-racial, multi-faith community organization that believes all people have a voice and the power to transform their communities and the country.

Image: Michelle Dione captured on the viral video of “BBQ Becky” calling the cops on a group of Black people for having a barbecue at Lake Merritt in April 2018. View the video at https://youtu.be/Fh9D_PUe7QI.

Editor’s note: The following is a Power Moves toolkit Power in Practice example.

It was a significant moment when the Ford Foundation, which grants out more than $500 million annually, recently shifted its grantmaking priorities to focus entirely on inequality. Then came Ford’s Building Institutions and Networks (BUILD) initiative, providing long-term capacity support for social justice organizations.

The foundation recognizes that, to make lasting progress in addressing inequality, social justice organizations need robust, sustainable support. They need investments in their essential programs and operations that help them to build a sturdy foundation for their work. They need predictable, flexible support to become more durable and resilient. Social justice groups also need funds that allow them to seize moments of opportunity and respond quickly to unexpected challenges.

To this end, BUILD is a five-year, $1 billion investment in the long-term capacity and sustainability of up to 300 social justice organizations around the world. Ford’s support aims to strengthen these institutions, making them more effective at achieving their core missions and reducing inequality in all its forms. Through BUILD, grantees are seen as partners and collaborators. The organization is in the driver’s seat, with the trust, flexibility and support they need to do their best work.

Through BUILD, Ford provides support to social justice organizations in the following ways:

  • Flexible funding
  • Organizational assessment
  • Focused strengthening
  • Peer learning
  • Rigorous evaluation

While Ford is able to invest in long-term capacity support on a large scale, any foundation can adopt practices to strengthen their core grant partners as they strive for community change.

Lisa Ranghelli is senior director of assessment and special projects at NCRP and primary author of Power Moves: Your essential philanthropy assessment guide for equity and justiceFollow @NCRP and @lisa_rang on Twitter, and join the conversation using #PowerMovesEquity!

This post is part of a series of case examples on building, sharing and wielding power for NCRP’s Power Moves toolkit. 

A few years ago, after I’d carefully planned and marketed a webinar, one of our board members notified me that the date conflicted with Rosh Hashanah.

A colleague working with me on the project advised me to cancel it, but I hesitated. How many people would we really lose if we moved forward with the date we selected?

Ultimately I cancelled it, but I have seen this scenario play out over and over again.

This year a Jewish colleague was invited to an event important to our work, but the date conflicted with Rosh Hashanah. When she brought it to the attention of the organizers, their response was similar to mine several years ago.

“Others can’t come either for a variety of reasons,” they said, “but we will move forward with our existing plans.”

When she posted about her experience on social media, many other Jews who work in progressive circles echoed her frustration and shared similar experiences. Muslims, Hindus and others who observe non-Christian religious holidays have shared similar experiences with me.

Decisions like this are more than a faux pas in diversity and inclusion practice; they reflect strategic oversights that progressive organizations and funders have been making for years.

By failing to accommodate or consider the practices and priorities of faith communities that share commitment to our issues and our work, we exclude key constituents that can help us be successful.

My hesitation was partially due to my privilege as a Christian, whose major holidays are acknowledged nationally. I didn’t have a full understanding how important Rosh Hashanah is to some of NCRP’s key constituents.

Instead of taking the word of a respected board member, I wanted more proof or data about how this would affect people before I changed my well-thought-out plan. This is textbook power and privilege.

But given the prevalence of the incidents like this, I think there is also some implicit bias at play. And that bias has larger repercussions than events scheduling. 

In 2016 NCRP hosted a webinar about the historic and present role of faith communities and faith-based movements in advancing social justice. A common theme was the decrease in foundation funding for faith-based social justice work. NCRP nonprofit members echo the same feedback.

In short, funders with explicit faith-based values aren’t funding social justice work. And social justice funders aren’t funding faith-based work.

In numerous conversations with funders who follow this trend and grant recipients who experience it, none can give a clear answer about why it’s happening. Some funders, like Marguerite Casey Foundation, and Proteus Fund and its partners, defy the trend, by there are very few.

Thankfully we in the U.S. have the freedom to practice religion as we choose, or not to practice at all. I have been in dialogue with movement leaders, and others, who reject institutional religions for sound reasons.

But it is irrational for highly inclusive and strategic institutions to make choices that exclude people of faith who are allies and constituents. 

While it is silly to do it in acute ways, like scheduling an event on a holiday, it is dangerous to do it in systemic ways, like excluding faith-based social justice groups from funding strategies.

Systemic change requires movement and coalition building, and we cannot afford to dismiss existing and active allies.

My colleague and my board member challenged me to not only check my privilege as I decided what was important, but also created space for me to consider the implications of excluding core constituents from a strategic discussion about how we can advance common goals. 

This year, on Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement), social justice organizations and philanthropy can take the opportunity to apologize for our oversights and commit to more inclusive practices that are not only right, but also necessary for our collective victory. 

Jeanné Isler is the VP and chief engagement officer at NCRP. She also serves on the board of Faith in Public Life and is a former faith-based community organizer. Follow @j_lachapel and @NCRP on Twitter.

Image by Alex Proimos. Used under Creative Commons license.

Editor’s note: The following is a Power Moves toolkit Power in Practice example.

“By partnering with the organizations we fund, we have a unique opportunity to support transformative, community-based action to produce just and fair systems and processes. The urgency to fund this type of racial justice work is evident in the inequities we’re seeing daily. … Understanding the root causes of these disparities, partnering with community-based organizations and other funders, and working collaboratively to propose solutions will be key in having a lasting impact that will not only affect Boston and Chelsea, but can serve as best practice for other cities and towns across the Bay State and the country.” – Jocelyn Sargent, Executive Director, The Hyams Foundation

The Hyams Foundation is a private, independent foundation with a mission of increasing economic, racial and social justice and power within low-income communities in Boston and Chelsea, Massachusetts. Hyams’ one overarching goal is to dismantle persistent, racialized economic disparities while engaging in close collaboration with others. NCRP listed Hyams as a top social justice funder. Since 2008, the foundation granted over $35 million, of which 68 percent went toward social justice.

Hyams has undergone an intentional journey to internalize racial equity in all facets of the organization. Not only is the board and staff diverse regarding race and gender, but the foundation also has strong representation of leaders from social change organizations. Hyams’ belief is that well-functioning organizations with racially and ethnically diverse boards and staff are more effective in serving communities. Additionally, the foundation includes board and staff diversity as an application criterion.

The foundation demonstrates its core value of inclusivity in other ways as well. Recently Hyams released a first-of-its kind report, Racial Inequities, Policy Solutions: Perceptions of Boston’s Communities of Color on Racism and Race Relations, which elevates the opinions of Boston voters of color on policy solutions to address racial equity.

Hyams has also committed to addressing three important racial justice challenges in Boston and Chelsea today, with the understanding that these may evolve over time based on community input. Each one has emerged from the community, has involved active organizing and related efforts by Hyams’ grantees and others and presents specific current or emerging policy change agendas with potential for results.

From the board room to staffing, from research to grantmaking, Hyams brings community leaders into its decision-making to truly share power.

Lisa Ranghelli is senior director of assessment and special projects at NCRP and primary author of Power Moves: Your essential philanthropy assessment guide for equity and justiceFollow @NCRP and @lisa_rang on Twitter, and join the conversation using #PowerMovesEquity!

Editor’s note: This post is part of a series of case examples on building, sharing and wielding power for NCRP’s Power Moves toolkit. Register now for “Ceding Control: Sharing philanthropy’s power for equitable, inclusive relationships,” a FREE webinar on Sept. 20, co-hosted with Funders for LGBTQ Issues.

Southern cities are growing – many at a much more rapid pace than the national average. According to the U.S. Census, eight out of the 15 cities with the largest population gains are in the South.

This is due in large part to historically cheap real estate, minimal regulation (which conservative legislators intend to keep in place) and corporate relocations from the North fueled by massive tax breaks.

While unemployment is at a historic low, stagnant wages and precarious employment have made it hard for the average southerner to see much fruit bearing from their labor.

Organizers and community leaders are moving forward with city-based strategies to bring equity and democracy into development, because place does matter.

Despite anti-democratic state pre-emption tactics, well-documented voter suppression tactics and gerrymandering, grassroots coalitions and local movements remain resilient and are fighting back.

Georgia STAND-UP, the long-time Atlanta affiliate of Partnership for Working Families, has fought for a more inclusive city amidst an era of tremendous growth and rapid displacement that will have a lasting impact on the city’s skyline and cultural fabric for generations to come.

Investment in movement-building organizations and leaders in the region by philanthropy is paramount to sustaining and preserving the South’s rich history of resistance.

Similar to findings pointed out in Grantmakers for Southern Progress and NCRP’s series As the South Grows, the Partnership believes that building sustainable, and local, sources of funding and lifting up voices from the region is key to building an even stronger movement for the long haul.

There isn’t a better time to organize with and build community in the South than now. I have been inspired by the tenacity of Stand Up Nashville (SUN) to put communities and transparency first as its city experiences the largest development frenzy in decades.

This year, the coalition was instrumental in the passage of the “Do Better” Bill, legislation that requires developers and contractors to disclose wages, hiring practices, and health and safety records as a condition of receiving tax breaks from the city.

The coalition has been one of the loudest voices calling attention to the injuries and fatalities crisis in the construction industry, where 16 workers have died from preventable injuries on the job in the last two years alone.

SUN recently launched a campaign demanding a Community Benefits Agreement (CBA) at a proposed Major League Soccer (MLS) stadium development, securing the first agreement of its kind in Tennessee. This CBA sets a new standard for how development should happen in Nashville, and potentially cities across the South, with affordable housing, wage standards, training and enforcement requirements.

The Durham Equitable Development Collaborative is also organizing to develop a similar equitable development model in the face of rapid redevelopment of public housing in its downtown core, all while navigating the retaliatory nature of the state’s General Assembly.

The collaborative is led by Power Up NC and groups like Durham CAN, the North Carolina A. Philip Randolph Institute and Durham For All.

For more than a decade, the Partnership for Working Families and its network for 19 grassroots and community organizations has driven and supported comprehensive trans-local campaigns to transform cities and institutions that have historically benefitted from and perpetuated racialized inequality.

Building movements and building leaders in the South is critical to the dismantling of the legacy of slavery and creating real power and victories for working people of color and immigrants.

“For people of color, it’s always implied that we are beneficiaries of the system – not that we are the system,” said SUN Co-Chair Odessa Kelly. “And once we shift that perspective, that’s when we start to change things. When we change the perspective, then we change what people desire and want, and that’s how we make changes on the state and national level.”

Over the last two years, we have developed a set of recommendations based on what we are learning about best practices in equitable development campaigns in Nashville, Tennessee, and Durham, North Carolina, thanks in part of generous support from the Open Society Foundation.

We developed these recommendations with our allies at Estolano LeSar Advisors, a community-development consulting firm with decades of experience advising cities, foundations and advocates.

Our project also provided local capacity and support to our community-based partners in both cities.

Organizing with communities and leaders in the South must be rooted in and respectful of the lives of the people most impacted by the transformation.

And, while conservative and corporate forces have dismantled or turned government on its citizens, local government remains one of the arenas where everyday people can have a say.

Recommendations for Building a New Model for Community-Centered Development:

Invest in people:

  • Leadership development – both inside organizations and outside in the community, such as members and resident leaders – is core to building the confidence and expertise to move a program and campaign.
  • Organize, organize, organize! We must empower residents to want and achieve greater access to the development decisions that affect their everyday lives. Building a coalition that represents diverse stakeholders and approaches is crucial. A campaign is only as strong as the people it reaches, beyond boardrooms and council chambers.
  • Build power for the long haul, not just short-term solutions. The tools and strategies we covered are intended to set your communities on a trajectory for building power in cities and having a movement that continues beyond its first victory. There will be losses and struggles in the process.

Democratize development in our cities:

  • Build statewide advocacy to ensure cities have all the policymaking tools at their disposal to alleviate crises, respond to the needs of their residents and create innovative policies that address displacement, unemployment, low wages and other issues.
  • Adopt transparency and accountability policies, especially for projects receiving public subsidies, that provide the community with opportunities to learn about and engage in decisions made about publicly owned land and publicly subsidized developments in their neighborhoods that will affect their health and well-being.
  • Empower communities with the tools and leverage to ensure that development creates benefits that protect workers, create good jobs and affordable housing, address environmental mitigation and identify other strategies to navigate state interference.
  • Enlist elected leaders and local government staff as partners in developing solutions and in navigating state interference where possible.

You can find our toolkit here.

Jackie Cornejo is Southern region equitable development strategist at Partnership for Working Families. Follow @JackieCornejoG and @P4WF on Twitter.

Image courtesy of Partnership for Working Families